Royal Society Epitomises ‘Noble Cause’ Corruption

day

Roger Pielke, Jr. was quoted in a 29 November 2014 Telegraph article:

Royal Society epitomises ‘noble cause’ corruption
Warmists say they hope ‘evidence of trends in extreme weather’ will help to ‘galvanise’ worldwide ‘action’. What evidence, asks Christopher Booker.

The Telegraph
November 29, 2014

It was inevitable that, in its role as one of our leading warmist pressure groups, the once-revered Royal Society would join the propaganda campaign lobbying for a new global climate treaty in Paris next year. As the scientific case for the belief that the world is in the grip of runaway global warming continues to fall apart, it was equally predictable that the Society would fasten on to the one issue they have all been clutching at to keep the scare going. This is the claim that rising CO2 levels are responsible for all those dreadful “extreme weather events” we keep hearing about – floods, droughts, hurricanes, killer heatwaves and the rest.

Introducing the Society’s new report, Resilience to Extreme Weather, part-funded by the warmist billionaire Jeremy Grantham and assembled by like-minded academics and green lobby groups, its president, the geneticist Sir Paul Nurse, hopes that its “evidence of trends in extreme weather” will help to “galvanise” worldwide “action”.

The only problem is that its 128 pages produce virtually no evidence to support the belief that “extreme weather events” are becoming more frequent and intense – for the reason that virtually no such evidence exists, as even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) seems to accept.

Almost the only graph in the report is one co-authored in 2004 by the US climate scientist Roger Pielke Jr, which showed a rising trend line in the cost of damage from extreme weather. But as Pielke again shows in his new book Disasters and Climate Change, this increase is due to factors such as where vulnerable properties have been built. He includes an excoriatory passage on what he calls “the mystery graph”, published by the IPCC in 2007, purporting to show a link between the rising cost of weather damage and rising temperatures. The only citation given for this was that it was allegedly derived from another of Pielke’s own graphs, which he explains had shown nothing of the kind. As he argues, “the issue of disasters and climate change is a canonical example of ‘noble cause’ corruption in science”.

This might well serve as an epitaph on the whole of the Royal Society’s new report.

Fortunately, thanks to China, India and others, the chances of agreement on the global treaty they are all lobbying for are non-existent. Read more …

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

How Competing Securitized Discourses over Land Appropriation Are Constructed: The Promotion of Solar Energy in the Israeli Desert

solar

by Itay Fischhendler, Dror Boymel & Maxwell T Boykoff

Environmental Communication
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2014.979214
Published November 17, 2014

Abstract: Although solar farms are often favorably received by the public due to their contribution to clean energy, they are not conflict-free. In various contexts, this land-intensive technology often competes with other land uses like agriculture, nature reserves, and army training. As a result of this competition, interest groups often seek political leverage in order to prioritize their spatial use. Framing their uses as existential is one possible way to capture the attention of decision-makers. Yet, this securitization process may create a framing contest whereby different actors use similar securitization language to promote different land uses. This study is the first attempt to trace how this framing contest of securitized discourses over land appropriation is constructed. It is based on the Israeli experience of promoting solar energy in the Negev Desert, an area conceived as available to solar development. Through an analysis of protocols of Israeli policy-makers’ meetings between 2002 and 2011, the study documents the ways in which players adopt securitized language concerning various land uses such as energy, food, ecology, and traditional (national) security. The study found that the use of securitized framing varies between uses, forums, actors, and sectors. Yet competition between securities discourses remained uneven as, in the Israeli context, many players find it difficult to challenge the hegemonic role of traditional (national) security. Read more …

Posted in New Publications | Leave a comment

Webcast Now Available for Noontime Seminar on Climate Smart Agriculture in Asia

presentation10

Climate Smart Agriculture in Asia: Measurements, Implementation Strategy and Challenges

by Kritee Kritee
Senior Scientist, International Climate, Environmental Defense Fund

Watch the Webcast

Abstract: To feed a world of 9 billion people in 2050, it is vital to work with farmers in the developing world because many farms in developed countries have already reached what are currently maximum possible yields. A vast majority of farmers in developing countries own small-scale farms (< 2 acres in size) and are on the frontline of experiencing worsening impacts of climate change (e.g., increasing droughts, floods, seawater intrusion and heat waves). It is also crucial to note that protecting forests, increasing carbon content of the soils, water and N use efficiency can decrease global emissions by as much as 13 gigatons CO2eq/year by 2030 – more than a quarter of current annual global emissions. Local, regional and international organizations must, therefore, help farmers access the knowledge and tools they need both to be resilient to climate change and to help mitigate it. This talk will discuss greenhouse gas emission measurements and culturally-sensitive implementation strategies Environmental Defense fund is engaged in five states in India to 1) promote evidence-based locally appropriate climate-smart agricultural practices, and 2) improve farmer’s access to finance to improve the adoption rate of these practices.

Biography: Kritee is a part of Environmental Defense Fund’s international climate team that is linking farmers to the carbon market in ways that promote mitigation, support development in the rural economy, accelerate poverty alleviation, and strengthen adaptation to the effects of climate change. She is helping lay the groundwork for agricultural carbon offset protocols for small land holdings by directing a multi-partner research team at the five GHG (nitrous oxide and methane) measurements laboratories across three states in Southern India. This research team is examining the effectiveness of innovative farming practices in delivering the three-fold goal of increased crop yields, better farm economics and decreased GHG emissions. She also provides scientific input to EDF’s domestic legal teams’ efforts to improve government policies related to the energy sector, with a focus on mercury pollution from electric generation units.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Can FIFA’s Corruption Be Stopped?

fifa4

The world’s governing body of soccer is reeling from a scandal involving the next two World Cups in Russia and Qatar. But making it accountable will take more than an investigation.

Foreign Policy
November 16, 2014
by Roger Pielke, Jr.

Fans of American football have weathered a season of scandal, with claims of willfully disregarding knowledge of concussion damage and a culture of domestic abuse battering the National Football League’s top officials. But nothing comes close to the hailstorm that surrounds the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), the Swiss-based non-profit that oversees international soccer, including the quadrennial World Cup finals. Since 2010, the organization has found itself buried in an avalanche of allegations of corruption, notably surrounding how it awarded the 2018 and 2022 World Cups to Russia and Qatar.

On Wednesday, Nov. 12, FIFA released summary results of its internal investigation into the various allegations, and to the surprise of no one, found the 2018 and 2022 World Cup decisions to be “well-thought, robust, and professional.” Despite uncovering a litany of dodgy episodes and running into investigatory obstacles, such as destroyed computers from the Russian delegation, FIFA concluded that “the various incidents which might have occurred are not suited to compromise the integrity of the FIFA World Cup 2018/2022 bidding process as a whole.” In other words, this is basically par for the course.

In many ways it is: Since October 2010, when the Sunday Times successfully pulled off a sting of FIFA Executive Committee members accepting bribes in exchange for their votes in the World Cup bidding process, it has been fairly obvious to even casual observers that something was very wrong inside international soccer’s governing body. FIFA has also been criticized for its inaction over alleged human rights violations in Qatar, associated with the building of stadiums for the 2022 World Cup. And it has steadfastly supported Russia during the ongoing international concerns over its invasion and appropriation of parts of Ukraine. FIFA issued an apology last week for showing a promotional video of the 2018 World Cup that included Crimea as a part of Russia. (In addition to taking territory, Russia has also absorbed Crimean professional soccer teams into its domestic league.) UEFA, the Union of European Football Associations (itself a subset of FIFA) has declared that it will not recognize the results of Crimean clubs within the Russian league. So routine are allegations of impropriety that the general public seems no longer surprised by the chicanery; it’s top executive, the long-serving autocrat Sepp Blatter, would lose badly to Dr. Evil in a popularity contest but still manages to keep an iron grip on power.

But perhaps this scandal is different. One British MP called it a “whitewash.” Greg Dyke, the chairman of Britain’s Football Association, went further: “I don’t think Fifa is a straight organisation and hasn’t been for many years,” he said on television. And then, in a plot twist worthy of an episode of House of Cards, no reaction to this week’s FIFA announcement was more surprising than that of Michael Garcia, the U.S. investigator who was appointed by FIFA itself to prepare the 430-page investigatory report (which is being closely held by FIFA). Upon FIFA’s release of its internal conclusion on the integrity of the World Cup bidding process, Garcia said that the summary of his investigation contained “numerous materially incomplete and erroneous representations of the facts.” The president of the Bundesliga, the German soccer league, has already put forward the unthinkable — that UEFA might leave FIFA if Garcia’s report is not released in full. Read more …

Posted in New Publications | Leave a comment

Climate Change Deal Requires U.S., China To Overhaul Energy Use

energy4

Roger Pielke, Jr. participated in a NPR news program on November 13, 2014:

Climate Change Deal Requires U.S., China To Overhaul Energy Use
Listen to the Audio

RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:

The deal that President Barack Obama and Chinese president Xi Jinping signed this week to curb climate change will require overhauling the way both countries use energy. Climate and energy experts are sorting out what has to happen to make the deal work. As NPR’s Christopher Joyce reports, they agree the goals are ambitious.

CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, BYLINE: The U.S. has actually lowered its emissions of the greenhouse gases that warm the planet over the past seven years by an average of about 1.5 percent a year. The new target will mean almost doubling that rate of change over the next 10 years. China’s goal is easier in the short term, no cuts in emissions now. Instead, China says its emissions will peak and start to drop by 2030. For the U.S., two measures are in play that will help lower emissions in the short term. Those are limits on emissions from vehicles and mandatory cuts in carbon dioxide from power plants. Elliot Diringer is an analyst at the climate think tank called the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

ELLIOT DIRINGER: I think that the U.S. number is predicated primarily on the vehicle standards that are in place and that will begin to cut in half the greenhouse gas emissions from new cars and on the power plant rule which is, at the moment, is a work in progress.

JOYCE: The power plant rule isn’t official yet, it’s due from the Environmental Protection Agency next year. Republicans and some coal state Democrats say it will destroy the coal industry and have vowed to fight it. China doesn’t have to cut emissions until 2030, but even making that deadline requires revamping its energy economy starting now. China says it will overhaul its electric power industry so that one-fifth of its electricity will come from something other than fossil fuels. Roger Pielke, Jr., a professor of environmental studies at the University Colorado says that’s a huge undertaking.

ROGER PIELKE, JR: That’s roughly the same as deploying one nuclear power plant of carbon-free energy every week starting today until 2030.

JOYCE: As difficult as these goals appear some see them as a glass half-full. Companies that are in the renewable energy business for example stand to see demand for their products rise.

ANNE KELLY: They are popping champagne this morning.

JOYCE: Anne Kelly is the climate director for CERES, an organization whose members are companies trying to reduce their carbon footprints.

KELLY: It sends the right signal to investors and companies who have known for a long time that the transition to a clean energy economy was one of the greatest economic opportunities we face.

JOYCE: The bilateral deal between the U.S. and China also represents a new way of negotiating climate action. The Kyoto treaty that limited emissions from developed countries ended in 2012 and the U.N. has failed to find a replacement that satisfies the world’s governments. Jennifer Morgan, a climate analyst for the World Resources Institute, says this deal could galvanize that effort.

JENNIFER MORGAN: There is a new model of international cooperation emerging. At the U.N. climate talks it’s a mixture of national commitment, national binding commitments, laws, regulations.

JOYCE: Commitments between individual governments, rather than treaties set by unanimous votes in the United Nations. Morgan says this deal could encourage other countries to craft commitments to cut carbon, but Pielke at the University of Colorado is less sure of that.

PIELKE, JR.: If you are in one of the poorer parts of the world where access to electricity is scarce and poverty is rampant, you probably aren’t paying much attention to these promises from the rich countries around the world.

JOYCE: The world will find out at the end of next year. The U.N. is asking the world’s governments to come to Paris with their own commitments to cut greenhouse gases and craft a new international treaty.

Christopher Joyce, NPR News.

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

Webcast Now Available for Noontime Seminar on Media and Climate Adaptation

presentation9

Let’s Hear from the People: A Study on Media Impact on Climate Protection and Climate Adaptation

by Gesa Luedecke
Sustainability Sciences, Leuphana University, Lueneburg Germany

Watch the webcast

Abstract: Tackling sustainability and climate change issues requires concern and participation on every societal level. Reflecting on public discussions about sustainability and climate change in Germany over the past two decades, the individual level for taking action has scarcely been considered within this context. Besides political efforts to achieve technological and entrepreneurial modifications towards sustainable production, education of the population is also necessary to attain sustainable consumption. Beyond educating instances (e.g. school, family or friends), media are particularly discussed as being a socializing instance for shaping individual values and orientations towards sustainability. But can they also promote incentives and motivations to act sustainably? It is necessary to investigate media communication patterns that can either facilitate or hinder opportunities for individual participation in sustainable developments. My talk will therefore focus on if and how media coverage on climate change can impact young people’s actions regarding sustainable behavior. Empirical findings of my dissertation will be presented and discussed during this noontime talk.

Biography: Gesa Luedecke studied Environmental Sciences at the University of Lueneburg, Germany with focus on environmental communications, sustainability and media as well as informal learning. Gesa holds a Diploma degree in Environmental Sciences and a Ph.D. in Sustainability Sciences from Leuphana University. She has ongoing interest in environmental and sustainability communication, climate change and sustainability communication via media, media communication and sustainable behavior as well as in inter- and transdisciplinary studies. Her research focus is on the influence of media communication about climate change on individual behavior. With her experience in transdisciplinary research, Gesa is seeking to provide support for cross-disciplinary collaborations on the themes of media communication and social learning for decision-making in climate-related issues.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Updated Figures: Media and Climate Change Observatory (MECCO)

mecco1

The Media and Climate Change Observatory (MECCO) monitors fifty sources across twenty-five countries in seven different regions around the world. MECCO assembles the data by accessing archives through the Lexis Nexis, Proquest and Factiva databases via the University of Colorado libraries. These fifty sources are selected through a decision processes involving weighting of three main factors:

  • geographical diversity (favoring a greater geographical range)
  • circulation (favoring higher circulating publications
  • reliable access to archives over time (favoring those accessible consistently for longer periods of time)

World, Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand, Spain, United Kingdom, & United States (Updated October October 2014)

Figure Citations

Andrews, K., Wang, X., Nacu-Schmidt, A., McAllister, L., Gifford, L., Daly, M., Boykoff, M., and Boehnert, J. (2014). World Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming, 2004-2014. Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Web. [Date of access.] http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage.

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

CSTPR’s 2013 Annual Report Now Available

annualreport

Center for Science and Technology Policy Research Annual Report
January 1 – December 31, 2013
2013 report [pdf]

Working to improve how science and technology policies address societal needs, through research, education and service

The Center for Science and Technology Policy Research (CSTPR) was established within CIRES in 2001 to conduct research, education, and outreach at the interface of science, technology, and the needs of decision makers in public and private settings. The Center focuses considerable attention on the intersection of the environment and society, where it applies the social and policy sciences to problems of environmental change, management, and sustainability. The Center’s research is integrated with the ongoing activities of CIRES, NOAA, CU-Boulder, and the broader science and technology community.

Letter from the Director

During the summer of 2014, as this annual report was being finalized, I had a chance to organize a dinner with some of the alums of the CIRES Center for Science and Technology Policy Research. The former students, now friends and colleagues, come from a remarkably diverse array of professions. These alums today work for the United Nations, a major research university, an international energy consulting firm, and a leading science association, among other places. It is an impressive bunch.

More than anything else, these former students exemplify the sharp focus on science, technology and decision making that we hold as our mission at CSTPR. Doing research that makes a difference requires engagement, always as an orientation and often as a calling. Over the past 12 years, CSTPR has focused on research, education and outreach where science, technology and decisions collide, with notable achievements.

So it was with great enthusiasm that I agreed to serve another term as Center director, starting in late 2013, succeeding Professor William Travis. At our summer dinner one of my former students asked about the Center’s secret for developing such successful alums. My answer was to pick people destined to succeed and get out of their way. It’s a good philosophy for directing this Center as well.

In 2013, the Center’s faculty and staff had some notable achievements. You can read all about them in this annual report. I do want to highlight two of our most innovative efforts, and ones that we hope to build upon in coming years:

The Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre Internship Program, led by Max Boykoff and Meaghan Daly, seeks to improve climate change communication and adaptation decision-making in response to climate variability and change within the humanitarian sector. The program placed its first interns in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia during the summer of 2013. We hope to further institutionalize this program in the coming years.

The Graduate Certificate in Science and Technology Policy, now in its ninth year, is a rigorous educational program to prepare students pursuing graduate degrees for careers at the interface of science, technology, and decision making. The program currently includes 22 students from a variety of CU departments and institutes. Twenty-three students have received certificates from the program and have found careers in government, academia and nonprofits. We are in the earlier stages of discussions about turning this certificate into a degree-granting program.

As the Center moves well into its second decade we look forward to building upon the notable successes of the past, but also breaking new ground. Watch this space – it will be an exciting time to come.

Roger Pielke, Jr.
Director
pielke@colorado.edu

Posted in Announcements, New Publications | Leave a comment

November 12: Global Challenges and Good Governance-Can Sport Deliver?

andersen3

Wednesday, November 12 at 4:00 PM

A talk by Jens Sejer Andersen
Danish Institute for Sports Studies, Aarhus, Denmark
journalist, international director and founder of Play the Game

University of Colorado Boulder
Eaton Humanities, Room 135
View Flyer | More Info

Across the Western Hemisphere, a crisis of public confidence is shaking the International Olympic Committee and the international federations that deliver the Olympic competitions. At various referendums and public debates, taxpayers reject the prospect of bidding for future Olympics. Match-fixing with or without relation to gambling crime has caused police and governments to react worldwide. The doping industry continues to play cat-and-mouse with international controllers. FIFA and other governing bodies are regularly exposed for corruption, mismanagement and rigged elections. How can international sport get out of its political quagmire? One essential requirement is better governance in the international sports organisations, but the governing bodies that control world sport are reluctant to change. Play the Game’s advocacy for good governance in sport has positioned the initiative and the biennial Play the Game conference as a leading voice for democracy, transparency and freedom of expression in international sport. Play the Game’s founder and international director Jens Sejer Andersen will outline a number of current corruption cases in international sport and present some attempts to remedy the situation, among others the Sports Governance Observer, a benchmarking tool developed in cooperation with six European universities.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Webcast Available for Noontime Seminar on Environmental Harms of the Electronics Commodity Chain

presentation8

Blind Spots: Electronics Firms, and the Social and Environmental Harms of the Electronics Commodity Chain

by Lucy McAllister, Environmental Studies, University of Colorado

Watch the webcast

Abstract: The global electronics commodity chain perpetuates widespread human and environmental harms, including the global sale of ‘conflict minerals’ that are used to fund the violence of warlords (Spectrum 2011), the depletion of virgin minerals and precious metals, primarily, from Africa (Boone & Ganeshan 2012), the persistence of unsafe and environmentally hazardous working conditions at electronics factories in Asia (Zhou 2013), and the abridgement of electronics workers’ rights to unionize (Cheng et al. 2012). The practices commonly used to recycle electronic waste (e-waste) in the informal sector of developing countries, where roughly 50-80% of the global hazardous e-waste stream is sent, also produce severe harms, including health risks especially for women and children (Frazzoli 2010).

Despite the lead role that multinational electronics firms’ likely play in the social and environmental harms of the electronics commodity chain, little research has been done on these issues. The aim of this project is thus to investigate how the specific role of lead firms in producing severe human and environmental problems throughout the electronics commodity chain has gone largely unnoticed by external audiences. Using impression management theory, I will ask whether or how electronics firms use impression management mechanisms to shift attention away from their detrimental business practices, thereby legitimizing themselves in the eyes of the public, and making it easier to sell their products and accumulate capital.

Biography: Before coming to study at the University of Colorado, Boulder, Lucy McAllister graduated summa cum laude from Connecticut College in 2009 with a B.A. in Environmental Studies and German Studies. After college, Lucy spent time in Hamburg, Germany on a Fulbright scholarship and, later, worked at the German Consulate in Chicago, Illinois. Lucy completed her M.S. in environmental studies at CU in May 2013, and has continued within the environmental studies program to pursue a PhD.

Broadly, Lucy explores the business-society-environment relationship, focusing on the role of lead firms in the human and environmental harms of the electronics commodity chain. She was the 2012 Theory in Critical Political Ecology Paper Competition Winner at the University of Kentucky’s Dimensions of Political Ecology Conference, and, in the fall of 2013, Lucy was awarded a CIRES Graduate Research Fellowship. Lucy’s first article, ‘Women, E-waste & Technological Solutions to Climate Change,’ was recently published by the Health and Human Rights Journal in June 2014.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment