Roger Pielke quoted in Al Jazeera America article on extreme weather

Roger Pielke, Jr. quoted in an Al Jazeera America article on extreme weather.

The next superstorm: Preparing for extreme weather
Scientists debate impact of climate change, but agree we must brace ourselves for natural disasters

Hurricane Katrina wreaks havoc on the Gulf Coast in 2005. Superstorm Sandy brings destruction to the East Coast in 2012. Heavy rains in the middle of the country lead to flooding in the rugged Rocky Mountains in 2013.

Each crisis brings greater urgency to preparations for the next storm. Scientists disagree on whether climate change is causing these cataclysms, but agree that humans, whose carbon emissions have altered the environment, need to change their thinking and habits to reflect the new, powerful effects of disastrous weather.

“All weather events these days are affected by climate change,” argues Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and a lead author of several assessments by the United Nations-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Extreme events like Sandy “are developing in an environment that is different than it would have been without climate change,” he told Al Jazeera. For instance, climate change has made our world wetter, meaning storms pack more water power: “It rains harder, the storms tend to be a bit stronger,” Trenberth said. Read more …

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

Roger Pielke, Jr. in AP article on Superstorm Sandy

Roger Pielke, Jr. in AP article on Superstorm Sandy

Tallying Sandy’s death, damage becomes complex task
by Geoff Mulvihill, Associated Press

Tracking the toll of a disaster like Superstorm Sandy is not like keeping score at a baseball game. Its damage to lives and property may never be known precisely, and there are multiple ways to tally it.

In the case of deaths, tracking is done in some places by state governments, and in some by counties, and without one standard as to whether a death is attributable to the storm.

The federal government has reported two different death totals from the Oct. 29, 2012, storm. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, relying on data from the American Red Cross, counted 117. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration tally, which used local government figures and media accounts, was 159 caused directly or indirectly by the storm. Read more …

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

Deserai Crow Receives New Grant Examining Recent Colorado Floods

Deserai CrowDeserai Anderson Crow and Elizabeth Albright (Duke University) are analyzing local-level policy responses to extreme flood events in the aftermath of Colorado’s 2013 floods. Policy learning in the wake of extreme events can at times lead to adaptation of local policies to increase the resilience of communities faced with risk from extreme events. By examining the occurrence of and response to extreme flooding events, this study seeks to illuminate the important factors explaining variation in local level policy learning in response to the extreme floods. This study, funded by a Quick Response Grant from the University of Colorado’s Natural Hazards Center, will involve a cross-case investigation of communities affected by the September 2013 floods in Colorado, and the community-level decisions made in response to those floods.

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

Boykoff Speaking at University of Copenhagen on Media and Climate Change

Max BoykoffOn October 22, Max Boykoff will be speaking at the University of Copenhagen’s Sustainability Science Centre on “What have future generations done for me lately? Making sense of the role of media in shaping awareness and engagement with climate change”. In his talk, Boykoff will highlight how particular problems in the web of interaction between science, media, policy and the public have contributed to (mis)perceptions, debates, and varied understandings to climate challenges. View event information.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Curtailment of Renewables Report Released

Xi WangGraduate student Xi Wang and a group of international collaborators recently released a report providing an overview of curtailment trends of wind and solar energy in nine countries. The study was conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) as part of the International Energy Agency Wind Task 25 on Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power.

Curtailment of renewables–a practice by which wind and solar facilities are not generating electricity at their maximum potential–has become an important issue recently as more renewables are added to the electricity grid.

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

Climate Wise Women

University Theatre in the Theatre Building, CU Boulder | 7:30 PM
Free Admission | Please reserve a ticket here

There are only 400 seats in the University Theatre. Reserving a ticket in no way ensures that you will get a seat. We recommend that you arrive early to be sure you are seated for this event. Enjoy the show!

Women who see high tides destroy their food supply and submerge their homes. Women who watch a merciless cycle of unprecedented floods followed by droughts drown their children, wash away their livelihood, and then suck their crops dry again. Women who pick up the pieces, improvise solutions and, facing their very survival, carve out unconventional paths to leadership.

Climate Wise Women is a global platform for the promotion of women’s leadership on climate change. Through powerful personal narratives, Climate Wise Women gives a human face and voice to an issue that sits squarely at the nexus of the conversation on gender equality, environmental justice, food security, the eradication of extreme poverty, and public health.

Join us for an evening with two amazing women:

More Information

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

More Authoritarian Politics is Not the Solution to Climate Change

Last Friday, Björn-Ola Linnér and Roger Pielke, Jr. had an op-ed in the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter that discussed the role of experts in politics. They argue that, “a commitment to democratic governance means accepting that power rests with the people, and not the experts.” An English translation appears below, courtesy Björn-Ola Linnér.

On Thursday, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change presented the first of four assessments, this one taking stock of the physical science of the climate system. The report’s reception and promotion highlights challenges that arise when expertise meets politics.

The temptation to use the conclusions to forward different political agendas will be abundant. And rightly so, the initial idea behind the IPCC report was to provide an assessment of science that could be used by policy makers. This is clearly not a problem when politicians, activists, or lobbyists use the report in an open debate on how to address climate change. We should expect advocates to pick and choose among the report’s findings to find those bits that fit best with their agenda. That is how interests operate in democracies.

We see, however, for us, a worrying tendency among some scientists to use climate and other environmental science reports to advocate for more authoritarian political systems and call for an emergency order by emphasizing the worst-case scenarios of these reports as a “trump card” in political debates. Read more…

Posted in New Publications | Leave a comment