Webcast Now Available for Noontime Seminar on Climate Adaptation in Northern Tanzania

Knowledge Production, Access, and Use for Climate Adaptation at Local Scales in Northern Tanzania

Meaghan Daly, CSTPR and Environmental Studies Program, CU Boulder
Eric Lovell, Geography Department, CU Boulder
Mara J. Goldman, Geography Department and Institute for Behavioral Sciences, CU Boulder
Lisa Dilling, CSTPR and Environmental Studies Program, CU Boulder

Due to a loss in connection, this webcast was recorded in two parts
Webcast Part one
Webcast Part two

Abstract: Adaptation to climate change is a rapidly expanding area of research. Much emphasis has been placed on producing scientific data and tools to support adaptation planning, with less consideration of how such knowledge can actually be linked with local adaptation decision-making. Additionally, the exclusive use of scientific knowledge has often excluded other forms of knowledge (e.g., local, indigenous), which have much to offer toward adaptation decision-making. In response, there have been increased calls to more effectively incorporate multiple forms of knowledge within adaptation planning. However, there are distinct challenges to bringing together different kinds of knowledge, including varying conceptions of what constitutes ‘valid’ knowledge across epistemologies and scales, as well as uneven power relations among stakeholders. Co-production of knowledge has been offered as a means of addressing these challenges, but questions remain about how best to facilitate processes of co-production. This talk will present a theoretical perspective and methodology, drawing on modified Actor Network Theory and Knowledge System Criteria (Cash et al. 2003), to examine production, access, and use of knowledge for climate adaptation across institutional scales (village, national, and international) and epistemologies in Tanzania. Researchers will share preliminary findings from the first phase of data collection, emphasizing the multiple dimensions of knowledge production, access, and use at local scales in northern Tanzania that must be considered within knowledge co-production efforts.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Webcast Now Available for Noontime Seminar on Place Attachment, Performance and Climate Change Adaptation

Webcast now available for CSTPR’s noontime seminar on place attachment and climate change adaptation

Place Attachment, Performance and Climate Change Adaptation
 by Saffron O’Neill, Human Geography, University of Exeter
Watch the webcast

The process of climate change adaptation requires an understanding of values at risk, in order that potential trade-offs, limits, and barriers are illuminated when making adaptation decisions. Whilst some values are quantifiable (e.g. land lost with sea-level rise), many are not (e.g. loss of unique places). Thus methods are needed which elucidate these important but intangible values at risk.

The small town of Lakes Entrance, Australia, is situated on a coastline highly vulnerable to flooding and sea-level rise. It is currently undergoing an extremely contested process of planning for projected sea-level rise. As such, it can act as an analogue for the process of climate change adaptation in semi-rural coastal settlements. A study was undertaken with residents to explore place attachment, and how these attachments might be impacted by flooding and sea-level rise.

This study responds to calls for geographers to be more imaginative in the types of methods they use to investigate the performance of the ‘everyday’. Photo-elicitation was used, and found to be a highly effective methodology for elucidating the performance of place attachment. The photos and associated narratives revealed cognitive, affective and behavioural dimensions of values that are at risk – from the biophysical hazards posed by climate change, but also from the climate adaptation decision-making process.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

New Pilot Episode for Inside the Greenhouse

NEW PILOT EPISODE for Inside the Greenhouse

About Inside the Greenhouse

Creative framing and storytelling of issues surrounding climate change through video, theatre, dance, and writing can connect a wider audience to the deep and pressing need to address climate change. View Episode

There are four components to the ITG project:
1.    a two-course series offered at the University of Colorado
2.    twice-a-year public events
3.    a 23-minute television program
4.    connected activities

The first component is comprised of two complementary parts. First, Professor Rebecca Safran has been teaching ‘Climate and Film’ in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology department since Fall 2009.

Second, in Spring 2012 the Professors Osnes and Boykoff taught an undergraduate upper division course with the objective of helping a cross-disciplinary group of students to understand, appreciate, and develop narratives or multimodal compositions – through performances, art, weblogs, and films. The interdisciplinary approach drew on each of their capabilities and interests to help students that seek to capture the complexity and dynamism of multi-scale and contemporary climate science, policy and politics. This course will be taught again in Spring 2014.

Together, ITG now offers the two courses that focus on communicating aspects of climate change through a variety of artistic forms including video, performance and writing.
•    Climate Change and Film (ATLS 3519/EBIO 4460) offered in Fall semesters by Safran
•    Inside the Greenhouse (ENVS 4100) offered in Spring semesters by Boykoff and Osnes

As the second component, in April, 2013 we held a successful pilot event with critically-acclaimed photographer (and star of the recent film ‘Chasing Ice’) James Balog where we attracted 1,500 people to Macky Auditorium on the CU-Boulder campus. The PI and colleagues have reserved Macky Auditorium October 6 and have confirmed participation from members of ‘Climate Wise Women’. By attracting the public to this issue through the celebrity status of our guest, the events provide an opportunity to shine a light on student work that uses creative means to communicate positive solutions to climate change. These events are used to engage a wide variety of area students in effective communication strategies for climate related issues as well as integrate better the coursework and skill set of our climate communication students into a larger public production.

As a third component of the ITG project, we are producing a pilot 23-minute program – incorporating creative climate communications from student projects assembled in our partner courses. The centerpiece of this program draws on part two of the project, recording from an on-stage interview with a high-profile public figure who has been wrestling with questions regarding climate science, policy and the public. As part of this, guests to the live event visit onsite locations in the Boulder community as part of the stories in the program, and as part of the important dimension of outreach beyond campus (e.g. K12 classrooms). The footage taken during these visits will also become part of the programs.

For the fourth component, we connect this work with other associated projects.

ITG is “the interface of climate and society. It melds the arts and environmental studies.” – Andrew Revkin, New York Times

ITG “creates opportunities for new scholarship, research, and creative works that may not happen in the absence of these courses.” – Todd Gleeson, dean of College of Arts and Science, University of Colorado

ITG is “a fitting way to highlight a productive intersection of theatre and environmental science.” – Philanthropist Gordon Gamm

“I think it is so important to have more communication courses in environmental studies, we often do not get to engage hands-on with our mission. I think a lot of environmentalists themselves buy into the culture gap between us and the conservatives, big business, etc. but that true progress is going to be made not by alienating but communicating to everyone in a positive way”. – Student Testimonial, Abrina

“Walking into class on day one, I was expecting to literally go inside a greenhouse. Walking away I now have a totally new understanding of the complexities surrounding climate change and the issues regarding education and action”. – Student Testimonial, Richard

“I think it’s so important to make the connections between climate science and media, because as many people in our class have mentioned, the typical node of communication in the scientific community is by publishing papers or reading research journals. While these are great methods, it’s crucial to have the environmentalists engage in various forms of social and mass media to get their messages out there to the world as a whole”. – Student Testimonial, Keely

“So in a way, this class has really challenged me to look inward and think about what my own motivations are for caring so deeply and passionately about environmental issues, in order to think about the best way to connect with audiences emotionally. This has allowed me to grow personally in ways that I really did not expect this semester, and I am thankful to have some newfound skills and tools for effective communication about important environmental issues in the future”. – Student Testimonial, Brooke

The Inside the Greenhouse course was made possible through generous funding by the Grace and Gordon Gamm Interdisciplinary Fund, the CU-Boulder Outreach and Engagement Program, and the Arts and Sciences Support of Education through Technology (ASSETT) program. Learn more …

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

Almost Famous: Can a Star-Studded Documentary Series Make People Care About Climate Change?

Max Boykoff’s media and climate change work referenced in a Columbia Journalism Review article on the new Showtime documentary series on climate change:

Almost famous
Can a star-studded documentary series make people care about climate change?

by Alexis Sobel Fitts.

Olivia Munn slinked into the airy lounge of Seattle’s Columbia Center as if she were trespassing on someone else’s film set. In truth, the actress had agreed to the shoot—part of an ambitious new documentary about climate change—out of benevolence, and was running late. The crew had already installed lights around a corner window, selected for its view of the Space Needle, and settled into a shuffleboard game with Jigar Shah, the green-energy expert Munn was scheduled to interview. On The Newsroom, Munn oozes gravitas—her character, an economics reporter, is known for her curt summaries of statistics. But in over-the-knee boots and a plaid sweater-coat, she appeared airbrushed, more starlet than newshound. “I apologize to everyone for the delay,” she said. “I didn’t get to sleep until 3am.”

Joel Bach, one of the film’s creators and executive producers, gave a nervous laugh. For months his production team had been briefing Munn on the story she was now expected to narrate. It would involve, of all things, coal. Specifically, a series of terminals slated to be built near Bellingham, WA, just over a hundred miles north of Seattle. It’s a complicated, wonky story, and Munn is no coal expert. She had given the crew 36 hours of her time, during which she’d film while being brought up to speed on the coal debate, a process that began immediately with a summary of cap and trade.

Munn reacted to the concept with surprise. “It’s like, I have to give you $10,000, but I get to decide where it goes?”

Bach nodded.

“That’s bullshit, Joel,” she said. “Are you kidding me? I could say it goes to my charity, Olivia Munn, Incorporated. I call bullshit on that.”

Invigorated by the exchange, Munn plopped herself across from Shah for a conversation about the economics of renewable energy. But unlike a normal interview, the revelations came mostly from the interrogator, offered in one-liners:

“Either way China’s our dad, right? Cause we either sell them our coal or we sell them our jobs.”

“Solar energy equals more jobs equals awesome.”

Munn ended the interview by quipping that she and Shah should run for governor, suggesting a team name: Jigamunn. “Oh my gosh, this is a win,” she cooed.

The sound guy looked flustered, but Bach seemed relieved. “She doesn’t sound like a journalist at all,” he said to no one in particular. “She’s great.”

Three years ago, when Bach and David Gelber, the film’s other co-creator and executive producer, left their jobs as producers at 60 Minutes to launch a television documentary series dedicated to climate change, colleagues told them they were crazy. The last mainstream documentary anyone had made on the subject was 2007’s An Inconvenient Truth. Al Gore’s film launched global warming into the public sphere but spawned few imitators—even as reports on the consequences of climate change grew more pronounced. The films that did make it to market in the wake of Gore’s effort failed to attract eyeballs outside of special-interest circles. And worse, most were boring.

But Bach and Gelber’s idea was that celebrity charisma could make a topic like coal leap off the screen and demand attention on a national scale. Their project tackles the story of global warming by sending a roster of famous people sashaying around the globe, filming segments about climate refugees in Bangladesh and the political battle over deforestation in Indonesia. Shortly after they quit their day jobs, Bach and Gelber had recruited an arsenal of A-list celebrities—names like Matt Damon, America Ferrera, Harrison Ford, and Jessica Alba—and convinced Jerry Weintraub and James Cameron to join as executive producers. The series, the first season of which airs on Showtime in April, even has an appropriately larger-than-life name: Years of Living Dangerously. Read more …

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

AAAS “Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering” Workshop Student Competition

American Association for the Advancement of Science
“Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering” Workshop Student Competition

Student competition to attend the AAAS “Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering” workshop in Washington, DC to learn about Congress, the federal budget process, and effective science communication. Students will have an opportunity to meet with their Members of Congress or congressional staff.

COMPETITION DETAILS

The CIRES Center for Science and Technology Policy is hosting a competition to send two CU students to Washington, DC to attend the AAAS “Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering” workshop. The competition is open to any CU graduate student or well-qualified graduating senior. Please submit a one-page statement explaining the importance of the workshop to your career development to ami@cires.colorado.edu by February 7, 2014. The evaluation committee will select two students from those who apply. The competition is being organized by the Graduate Certificate Program in Science and Technology Policy and is supported by the CU Graduate School. More Information.

Workshop Overview
AAAS Workshop: Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering
March 31, 2014

A coalition of scientific societies and organizations has created an exciting opportunity for graduate and upper-class undergraduate students in science, mathematics, and engineering disciplines to learn about science policy and advocacy.

Elected students will participate in a two-and-a-half day workshop in Washington, DC, beginning on March 31, 2014. Participants will learn about the structure and organization of Congress, the federal budget and appropriations process, and tools for effective science communication. In addition, students will participate in interactive seminars for both policy-making and communication. By the end of the workshop students will have an opportunity to learn about ways to remain engaged and involved either through a relevant professional society or through on-campus activities.

The day after the culmination of the workshop, students will form teams and conduct meetings with their elected Members of Congress and congressional staff members, putting into practice what they’ve learned.

This entry-level workshop is organized to educate students who are interested in learning about the role of science in policy-making, to introduce them to the federal policy-making process, and to empower them with ways to become a voice for basic research throughout their career. Space is limited to two students per institution. Registration and travel fees will be covered by the sponsor. Workshop Information.

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

CSTPR Part of Wiley-Ted Open-Source Learning Module on Climate Change

CSTPR’s Max Boykoff and Kanmani Venkateswaran are now part of an open-source learning module through Wiley-Ted Studies.

TED Studies: Environmental Studies – Climate Change

Wiley in collaboration with TED has published a curated series of talks plus specially commissioned educational support materials.

Teachers and students can use TED:Environmental Studies to explore the issues relating to one of the biggest threats to our planet. Specially commissioned contextual essays, activities, and multimedia resources link the science of urban planning to the real world, plus expanded academic content such as key terms and further reading. Overview.

Introductory Essay

Prof Max Boykoff and Dr Kanmani Venkateswaran (Univ of Colorado-Boulder) dissect the debate that rages on about climate change (natural and man-made), and explain how the subject has become so politicised, and what is needed to understand what is really going on behind all the hype and rhetoric. View Essay.

Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

‘Neglected Topic’ Winner: Climate Change

Max Boykoff’s media and climate change work mentioned in a New York Times article on climate change.

‘Neglected Topic’ Winner: Climate Change
by Nicholas Kristof

HERE’S a scary fact about America: We’re much more likely to believe that there are signs that aliens have visited Earth (77 percent) than that humans are causing climate change (44 percent).

That comes to mind because a couple of weeks ago, I asked readers for suggestions of “neglected topics” that we in the news business should cover more aggressively in 2014. Some 1,300 readers recommended a broad range of issues, which I look forward to pilfering (with credit!) — and many made a particularly compelling case for climate change.

A reader from Virginia quoted James Hansen, the outspoken climate scientist: “Imagine a giant asteroid on a direct collision course with Earth. That is the equivalent of what we face now.”

Another reader, Daria, acknowledged that the topic isn’t sexy but added: “Whether we ‘believe in it’ or not, all species on Earth are being subject to frightening disruptions in our weather, food supply, land.”

You would think that we would be more attentive, with the federal government a few days ago declaring parts of 11 states disaster areas because of long-term drought. More than 60 percent of California is now in extreme drought.

Yet we in the news media manage to cover weather very aggressively, while we’re reticent on climate. Astonishingly, coverage of climate has actually declined in mainstream news organizations since peaking in 2007, according to the count of researchers at the University of Colorado. (Coverage did increase last year after a low in 2012.) Read more …

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

CSTPR Noontime Seminar Series Spring 2014 Schedule

Adapting to Change: Promise, Pitfalls and Politics
Sponsored by the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research

Free and open to the public. All talks held in the CSTPR conference room unless otherwise noted. All talks will also be available via live webcast.

January 29 at 12:00 PM
Place Attachment, Performance and Climate Change Adaptation
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Saffron O’Neill, Human Geography, University of Exeter

February 5 at 12:00 PM
Knowledge Production, Access, and Use for Climate Adaptation at Local Scales in Northern Tanzania
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Meaghan Daly, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado

February 12 at 12:00 PM
The Energy-Water Nexus: Where Climate Adaptation and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies Collide
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Kristen Averyt, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Western Water Assessment

March 5 at 12:00 PM
Psychological and Community Correlates of Adaptation to Water Stress Among Smallholding Farmers in Sri Lanka
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Amanda Carrico, Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado

March 12 at 12:00 PM
Guinea Pigs of the Shale: Informed Consent and the Politics of Fracking
*CIRES Auditorium | Webcast | More Info
by Adam Briggle, Department of Philosophy and Religion, University of North Texas

April 2 at 12:00 PM
Reporting, Regulation, and the Governance of Climate Change in the U.K.
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Samuel Tang, Department of Geography, King’s College London

April 16, 2014
Visualising the Environment and the Politics of Representation
*IBS 155 B | Webcast | More Info
by Joanna Boehnert, Center for Science & Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado

April 23 at 12:00 PM
Playing with Fire: Social Interactions and Wildfire Mitigation Behaviors in Colorado
CSTPR Conference Room | Webcast | More Info
by Katie Dickinson, Climate Science & Applications Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, and Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Can We Remediate Wrongs?

Benjamin Hale has a chapter published in the new book Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics by Avram Hiller, Ramona Ilea, and Leonard Kahn, Eds. (December 2013, Routledge Studies in Ethics and Moral Theory).

Excerpt: Of the 4.9 million barrels of crude oil discharged into the Gulf of Mexico during and immediately after the Deepwater Horizon disaster, an impressive 41% of the oil was removed through human intervention. Such interventions included not only chemical dispersion {accounting for approximately 16% of the discharge), in situ burning {5%), and skimming (3%), but also a significant portion was captured directly from the well {17%). Researchers estimate that another 37% of the oil disappeared naturally, either through natural dispersion (13%) or through evaporation or dissolution {24%). As the remaining 22% of the oil continues to float in the gulf and threaten wildlife, the cost of the cleanup is expected to pass $41 billion (Hagerty and Ramseur 2010).

Notwithstanding these economic costs, many lives, human and non-human, have been affected by the spill. Countless sea critters, including fish and marine mammals, died gruesome deaths or ended up with genetically abnormal offspring. Fish, shrimp, and oyster stocks were decimated (in the literal sense of the term). More than 3,000 miles of beach and wetland areas were bathed in oil. Recreation in the area took an incredible hit. The devastation is tremendous, and those responsible for the event-British oil giant BP, primarily-are on the hook to clean it all up.

Many people want to say this: that pollution is wrong. Typically, they say this on harm grounds: Pollution is wrong because it is harmful to other people, to animals, or to nature more generally. This seems about right. Environmental damage is a serious consequence of polluting and it would seem wrong to impose it unjustifiably. These same people may have similar views about elephant poaching and rampant suburban expansion, to take just two examples, though such cases are not instances of pollution. That is, they may think that what makes poaching and rampant expansion wrong is also that it destroys the environment. In this way, pollution is just one of several forms of environmental wronging. Read more …

Posted in New Publications | Leave a comment

Exceptional Talent and US Immigration

Roger Pielke, Jr. has a new publication at Law in Sport on the analysis of immigration and US Soccer.

US immigration policy negatively impacts US Soccer
by Roger Pielke, Jr.

Excerpt: Issues related to immigration and citizenship have long been debated in the United States, and are reemerging as a political issue, with calls for reform coming from both Republicans and Democrats.

President Obama says that “the US immigration system is broken … there are 11 million people living in the shadows.”1 One consequence of the broken immigration system can be seen in US soccer, where certain immigrants to the United States are deemed ineligible to represent Team USA, despite meeting FIFA criteria for eligibility. This article explains this situation and recommends several alternative ways forward to better align the intent of FIFA regulations with their implementation in a US context by US Soccer. Read more …

Posted in New Publications | Leave a comment