RSS
American Geophysical Union Fall 2013 Meeting:
The Dynamics of Vulnerability and Implications for Climate Change Adaptation: Lessons from Urban Water Management
by Lisa Dilling
Thursday, December 12th
2:10 PM – 2:25 PM
NH43D-03. The Dynamics of Vulnerability and Implications for Climate Change Adaptation: Lessons from Urban Water Management by Lisa Dilling
Authors: Lisa Dilling, Meaghan Daly, William Travis, Olga Wilhelmi, Roberta Klein, Doug Kenney, Andrea J. Ray, and Kathleen Miller
Session: NH43D. NH43D. Climate Change Effects on Natural Hazards: Science, Communication and Policy I
Abstract: Recent reports and scholarship have suggested that adapting to current climate variability may represent a “no regrets” strategy for adapting to climate change. Filling “adaptation deficits” and other approaches that rely on addressing current vulnerabilities are of course helpful for responding to current climate variability, but we find here that they are not sufficient for adapting to climate change. First, following a comprehensive review and unique synthesis of the natural hazards and climate adaptation literatures, we advance six reasons why adapting to climate variability is not sufficient for adapting to climate change: 1) Vulnerability is different at different levels of exposure; 2) Coping with climate variability is not equivalent to adaptation to longer term change; 3) The socioeconomic context for vulnerability is constantly changing; 4) The perception of risk associated with climate variability does not necessarily promote adaptive behavior in the face of climate change; 5) Adaptations made to short term climate variability may reduce the flexibility of the system in the long term; and 6) Adaptive actions may shift vulnerabilities to other parts of the system or to other people. Instead we suggest that decision makers faced with choices to adapt to climate change must consider the dynamics of vulnerability in a connected system– how choices made in one part of the system might impact other valued outcomes or even create new vulnerabilities. Furthermore we suggest that rather than expressing climate change adaptation as an extension of adaptation to climate variability, the research and practice communities would do well to articulate adaptation as an imperfect policy, with tradeoffs and consequences and that decisions be prioritized to preserve flexibility be revisited often as climate change unfolds.
We then present the results of a number of empirical studies of decision making for drought in urban water systems in the United States to understand: a) the variety of actions taken; b) the limitations of actions available to water managers; and c) the effectiveness of actions taken to date. Time permitting, we briefly present the results of 3 in-depth case studies of drought response and current perception of preparedness with respect to future drought and climate change among urban water system managers. We examine the role of governance, system connectivity, public perceptions and other factors in driving decision making and outcomes. More information.
