{"id":3677,"date":"2019-05-07T16:07:14","date_gmt":"2019-05-07T16:07:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/?p=3677"},"modified":"2019-05-07T16:07:15","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T16:07:15","slug":"mecco-monthly-summary-coal-is-facing-intensifying-pressure-from-wind-and-solar-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/2019\/05\/07\/mecco-monthly-summary-coal-is-facing-intensifying-pressure-from-wind-and-solar-power\/","title":{"rendered":"MeCCO Monthly Summary: Coal is Facing Intensifying Pressure from Wind and Solar Power"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Media and Climate Change Observatory<\/a>\u00a0(MeCCO)<\/em>
April 2019 Summary<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Globally, the quantity of coverage remained steady as compared with the previous month of March 2019. However, coverage in April 2019 went up nearly 50% compared to coverage globally in April 2018.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across the seven regions we monitor (Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, North America, Oceania), Europe saw the largest rise in coverage, increasing nearly 12% from the previous month and up 89% from European coverage a year earlier (April 2018).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Within Europe, United Kingdom media coverage increased remarkably, up 39% from the previous month of March, and also up 167% from April 2018: cultural and political movements and pressures drove coverage, notably through Extinction Rebellion protests and Greta Thunberg actions (see below for more).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

April media attention to climate change and global warming continued to be driven by political economic, ecological\/meteorological, scientific and cultural themes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Figure 1 shows increases and decreases in newspaper media coverage at the global scale \u2013 organized into seven geographical regions around the world \u2013 from January 2004 through April 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This month we have added eight new European sources to our counts. These are Correio da Manh\u00e3<\/em> (Portugal), La Republica<\/em> (Italy), Corriere della Sera<\/em> (Italy), Le Monde<\/em> (France), Le Figaro<\/em> (France), El Mundo<\/em> (Spain), La Vanguardia<\/em> (Spain) and Expansi\u00f3n<\/em> (Spain). These new sources, along with previous monitoring in Europe enable us to now provide a regional tracking of 19 sources (see Figure 2). Overall, these new sources expand our monitoring to three new countries (Italy, France, Portugal) and two new languages (Italian and French). In Italian we search the terms \u2018cambiamenti climatici\u2019 and \u2018riscaldamento globale\u2019, in French we search \u2018changement climatique\u2019 and \u2018r\u00e9chauffement climatique\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, we at\u00a0MeCCO now track<\/a>\u00a0media coverage of climate change or global warming across 89 sources (newspapers, TV and radio) in 41 countries and 7 languages (English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Considering thematic dimensions of coverage in April, political<\/em> and economic <\/em>content punctuated media coverage throughout the month. For instance, in the United States (US), discussions of federal (in)action on climate change continued. For example, mid-month an Environmental Protection Agency \u2018Planning for Natural Disaster Debris\u2019 guide with mentions of climate change adaptation warranted coverage. Washington Post<\/a><\/em> journalists Juliet Eilperin and Brady Dennis wrote, \u201cThe Environmental Protection Agency published a 150-page document this past week with a straightforward message for coping with the fallout from natural disasters across the country: Start planning for the fact that climate change is going to make these catastrophes worse. The language, included in guidance on how to address the debris left in the wake of floods, hurricanes and wildfires, is at odds with the rhetoric of the EPA\u2019s own leader, Andrew Wheeler\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also in April, US Presidential candidates vying for the Democratic nomination have increasingly discussed their stances on climate change. These stances and platforms have garnered discernible media interest. For example, 2020 hopeful Beto O\u2019Rourke\u2019s $5 trillion plan to combat climate change attracted attention.\u00a0CNN<\/a><\/em>\u00a0journalists Kate Sullivan and Leyla Santiago reported \u201cformer Texas Democratic congressman’s plan called climate change “the greatest threat we face” and outlined a four-part framework to address this “existential threat” and “growing emergency … O’Rourke’s ambitious, first major policy rollout comes amid questions from voters and critics about how he would take on key issues should he be elected president\u201d. Meanwhile, Kathleen Ronayne and Will Weissert \u2013 covering Beto O\u2019Rourke\u2019s announcement for the\u00a0Associated Press\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0PBS Newshour<\/a><\/em>\u00a0– noted it \u201ccalls on the U.S. to guarantee net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, while promising to reach half that goal in just the next 11 years\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

And late in April, a\u00a0report from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis<\/a>\u00a0regarding the ongoing political economy of coal vis-\u00e0-vis renewable energy generation contributed to coverage of climate change. For example,\u00a0CNN<\/a><\/em>journalist Matt Egan wrote, \u201cThe renewable energy sector is projected to generate more electricity than coal during the month of April, according to a recent report published by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). That’s never happened before. Coal, long the king of the power sector, has already been dethroned by natural gas, a much cleaner burning fossil fuel. Now, coal is facing intensifying pressure from wind and solar power\u201d Egan quoted Dennis Wamstead from IEEFA who commented, \u201cFive years ago this never would have been close to happening\u2026The transition that’s going on in the electric sector in the United States has been phenomenal\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across the globe in April, many news stories focused on the\u00a0cultural\u00a0<\/em>arena. For example, in mid-April Amazon employees\u00a0penned an open letter<\/a>\u00a0to CEO Jeff Bezos, stating discontent with the company\u2019s stance on sustainability and climate change. Signed by approximately 4,500 workers, this disturbance in business cultures generated media attention. Journalist Karen Weise from\u00a0The New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported, \u201cEmployees at big tech companies have pushed back against their employers for working with the military and law enforcement offices, and demanded better treatment of women and minorities. Now, thousands of them are also taking on climate change. This week, more than 4,200 Amazon employees called on the company to rethink how it addresses and contributes to a warming planet. The action is the largest employee-driven movement on climate change to take place in the influential tech industry. The workers say the company needs to make firm commitments to reduce its carbon footprint across its vast operations, not make piecemeal or vague announcements. And they say that Amazon should stop offering custom cloud-computing services that help the oil and gas industry find and extract more fossil fuels\u201d. Meanwhile, reporter Joseph Pisani from the\u00a0Associated Press<\/a><\/em>\u00a0noted, \u201cThe online shopping giant, which already works with BP and Shell, has been trying to woo more oil and gas companies to use its technology to help them find drillable oil faster, angering workers who have been pushing Amazon to do more to combat climate change\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Also, media covered ongoing youth protects about climate change: particularly of Swedish activist Greta Thunberg as well as the United Kingdom (UK) movement Extinction Rebellion. For example, from US\u00a0National Public Radio<\/a><\/em>, David Greene and Frank Langfitt discussed how Extinction Rebellion disrupted \u2018business as usual\u2019 in London on April 17. Greene noted, \u201cprotesters have blocked traffic in parts of the city for several days now to put pressure on the British government to address climate change. Demonstrators have shut down 55 bus routes and, according to police, affected half a million people. Police have already made nearly 300 arrests\u201d. Meanwhile,\u00a0Guardian<\/a><\/em>\u00a0journalists Matthew Taylor, Damien Gayle and Libby Brooks observed, \u201cThousands of people have taken part in the civil disobedience protests since Monday, blockading four landmarks in the capital in an attempt to force the government to take action on the escalating climate crisis\u2026the four sites \u2013 Marble Arch, Waterloo Bridge, Parliament Square and Oxford Circus \u2013 remained under the control of protesters, causing delays and diversions in the surrounding areas\u201d. Also in\u00a0The<\/a><\/em>\u00a0Guardian<\/em><\/a>a few days later,journalists Vikram Dodd , Damien Gayle and Martha Busby wrote, \u201cGovernments will no longer be able ignore the impending climate and ecological crisis, Greta Thunberg, the teenage climate activist, has told Extinction Rebellion protesters gathered at Marble Arch in London. In a speech on Sunday night where she took aim at politicians who have for too long been able to satisfy demands for action with \u201cbeautiful words and promises\u201d, the Swedish 16-year-old said humanity was sitting at a crossroads, but that those gathered had chosen which path they wish to take\u201d. Read more …<\/a>
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Media and Climate Change Observatory\u00a0(MeCCO)April 2019 Summary Globally, the quantity of coverage remained steady as compared with the previous month of March 2019. However, coverage in April 2019 went up nearly 50% compared to coverage globally in April 2018. Across … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentaries"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-09-22 10:40:25","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3677"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3679,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677\/revisions\/3679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}