{"id":3557,"date":"2019-03-05T22:09:43","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T22:09:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/?p=3557"},"modified":"2019-03-05T22:09:55","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T22:09:55","slug":"mecco-monthly-summary-the-earth-is-a-climate-change-deadline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/2019\/03\/05\/mecco-monthly-summary-the-earth-is-a-climate-change-deadline\/","title":{"rendered":"MeCCO Monthly Summary: The Earth is facing a climate change deadline"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Media and Climate Change Observatory<\/a>\u00a0(MeCCO)<\/em>
February 2019 Summary<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

February media attention to climate change and global warming was up 9% throughout the world from the previous month of January, and up 63% from February 2018.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

While Asia, Middle East and Central\/South America coverage was down 8%, 12% and 15% respectively from the previous month, it was up in all other regions. For examples, coverage in Europe was up 8%, Oceania coverage increased 34% and North America media attention went up 8% in February compared to the previous month.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Figure 1 shows increases and decreases in newspaper media coverage at the global scale \u2013 organized into seven geographical regions around the world \u2013 from January 2004 through February 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 1. Newspaper media coverage of climate change or global warming in sixty-six sources across thirty-six countries in seven different regions around the world, from January 2004 through February 2019.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Figure 2 shows word frequency data in United States (US) newspaper media coverage in both January 2019 and February 2019. Despite a waning Trump influence in January (see word cloud depiction in Figure 2, left), his influence in media coverage in the US returned in February (see word cloud depiction in Figure 2, right). The slow disappearing feature of a \u2018Trump Dump\u2019 (where media attention that would have focused on other climate-related events and issues instead was placed on Trump-related actions, leaving many other stories untold) was counteracted by Trump Administration (in)action in the month of February, such as an absence of mention of climate change in his State of the Union address (that sparked media remarks) and the presence of Trump Administration critiques of the proposed \u2018Green New Deal\u2019 (see below for more).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 2.\u00a0<\/strong>Word cloud showing frequency of words (4 letters or more) invoked in media coverage of climate change or global warming in United States newspaper sources in January (left) and February (right). Data are from the\u00a0Los Angeles Times<\/em>,\u00a0The New York Times<\/em>,\u00a0USA Today<\/em>,\u00a0The Wall Street Journal\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0The Washington Post<\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In February, there were many media stories about climate change that touched on\u00a0political<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0economic\u00a0<\/em>content. In the US, committee hearings in the House of Representatives generated considerable media attention in early February. In particular, a hearing in the US House of Representatives\u2019 Committee on Natural Resources on climate change, and a subcommittee hearing in the Energy and Commerce Committee on the economic impacts of climate change generated media attention. For example,\u00a0MSNBC<\/a><\/em>\u00a0ran with the headline \u2018The House \u2013 finally \u2013 cares about climate change again\u2019 while journalist Jen Christensen from\u00a0CNN<\/a><\/em>\u00a0noted, \u201cPresident Donald Trump did not mention climate change or any efforts to help the environment during his State of the Union address Tuesday, but members of the US House of Representatives held two hearings Wednesday on Capitol Hill to take a closer look at the threat of climate change\u201d. Stephanie Ebbs from\u00a0ABC News<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported on dueling personalities in the hearings when she noted, \u201cranking Member Rob Bishop, R-Utah, raised concerns the hearing was too broad and not focused enough on the committee’s jurisdiction, which is federal conservation programs. Bishop said he wants to the committee to spend more time talking about how forests can be managed to promote clean air and protect states from smoke pollution as a result of wildfires in states like California\u2026”I have to mention I’m kind of a loss, I don’t know where this hearing is going or the other six you have planned because you haven’t told us what the goal is. At some point we may be asking, where are we going? What is the real legislation to help people that is supposed to come out of these hearings? To understand whether these hearings are for those of us around the horseshoe that are going to make legislation or this group that’s sitting at a table in the corner so they can write cute stories,” Bishop said, point toward reporters in the hearing room\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was a lot of political coverage relating to the Green New Deal \u2013 co-sponsored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Edward Markey (D-MA) \u2013 in February. This legislation was touted as \u201ca ten-year plan to mobilize every aspect of American society at a scale not seen since World War II to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and create economic prosperity for all”. Journalists Lisa Friedman and Glenn Thrush from\u00a0The New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported, \u201cLiberal Democrats put flesh on their \u201cGreen New Deal\u201d slogan on Thursday with a sweeping resolution intended to redefine the national debate on climate change by calling for the United States to eliminate additional emissions of carbon by 2030. The measure, drafted by freshman Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Senator Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, is intended to answer the demand, by the party\u2019s restive base, for a grand strategy that combats climate change, creates jobs and offers an affirmative response to the challenge to core party values posed by President Trump\u2026as a blueprint for liberal ambition, it was breathtaking. It includes a 10-year commitment to convert \u201c100 percent of the power demand in the United States\u201d to \u201cclean, renewable and zero-emission energy sources,\u201d to upgrade \u201call existing buildings\u201d to meet energy efficiency requirements, and to expand high-speed rail so broadly that most air travel would be rendered obsolete. The initiative, introduced as nonbinding resolutions in the House and Senate, is tethered to an infrastructure program that its authors say could create millions of new \u201cgreen jobs,\u201d while guaranteeing health care, \u201ca family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations and retirement security\u201d to every American\u201d. Meanwhile,\u00a0USA Today<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reporters Elizabeth Weise and Ledyard King noted, \u201cThe Earth is facing a climate change deadline, with a looming tipping point into a dramatically changed, less hospitable planet \u2013 and Democratic lawmakers are beginning what’s likely to be a long discussion over how best to deal with it. These first attempts have coalesced under a Green New Deal championed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass\u201d. As an illustration on US television, Amna Nawaz and William Brangham from\u00a0PBS Newshour<\/a><\/em>\u00a0discussed the scale and scope of the plan with co-sponsoring US Senator Ed Markey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In addition, a new \u2018scorecard\u2019 from the League of Conservation Voters was released late in the month, and this generated additional media attention in the US. It found that the differences in positions taken on climate change between Democrats and Republicans is stark, where the former has increasingly engaged with the issue over the past year. For example, journalist Dino Grandoni from\u00a0The Washington Post<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported \u201cDemocratic voters will have to decide among a slate of White House hopefuls tripping over themselves to commit to tackling climate change and other environmental issues. But which Democratic senator had the best environmental voting record in Congress last year? The answer: all of them. Each senator who has announced their candidacy for president received perfect scores in an annual voting scorecard kept by the League of Conservation Voters. The six declared 2020 candidates in the Senate \u2014 Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) \u2014 always aligned with positions the environmental organization deemed \u2018pro-environment\u2019. So too did a handful of Senate Democrats thought to be considering a run for president, including Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.)\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also in February, media covered\u00a0ecological\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0meteorological\u00a0<\/em>dimensions of climate issues. For example (intersecting with scientific coverage), public understanding and awareness of links between extreme weather and climate change was assessed in a\u00a0Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences<\/em>\u00a0study<\/a>\u00a0that garnered media attention in February. Through their research, the authors posited that over a period of approximately five years, what was considered once-extreme weather tends to become unremarkable and \u2018normal\u2019 weather. As an example of coverage,\u00a0CNN<\/a><\/em>\u00a0journalist Jen Christensen reported, \u201cThe extreme weather that comes with climate change is becoming the new normal, so normal that people aren’t talking about it as much — and that could make them less motivated to take steps to fight global warming, according to new research. Researchers analyzed more than 2 billion social media posts between 2014 and 2016. What they found was that, when temperatures were unusual for a particular time of year, people would comment on it at first. But if the temperature trend continued and there were unusual temperatures again at that time the following year, people stopped commenting as much\u201d. Read more …<\/a>
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Media and Climate Change Observatory\u00a0(MeCCO)February 2019 Summary February media attention to climate change and global warming was up 9% throughout the world from the previous month of January, and up 63% from February 2018. While Asia, Middle East and Central\/South … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentaries"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-10-31 20:29:16","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3557"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3557\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3560,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3557\/revisions\/3560"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}