![\"\"](\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/11\/mecco22.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Media and Climate Change Observatory<\/a> (MeCCO)<\/em> October media attention to climate change and global warming was up 43% throughout the world from the previous month of September 2018, and more than doubled (up 51%) from October last year. Upticks were detected across all regions of the world in October. Increased media coverage in October is attributed to attention paid to the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on impacts of 1.5\u00b0C warming, and to continued impacts and reverberations from hurricane and typhoon activity. An increase was most pronounced in Africa (up 79%) and Oceania (up 76%). Elsewhere, increases were also detected in Central\/South America (up 40%), North America (up 37%), Asia (up 24%) and Europe (up 43%), compared to the previous month of September.<\/p>\n In January of this year, MeCCO expanded coverage to sixty-two newspaper sources, six radio sources and six television sources. These span across thirty-eight countries, in English, Spanish, German and Portuguese. In addition to English-language searches of \u201cclimate change\u201d or \u201cglobal warming\u201d, we search Spanish-language sources through the terms “cambio clim\u00e1tico” or “calentamiento global”, German-language sources through the terms \u2018klimawandel\u2019 or \u2018globale erw\u00e4rmung\u2019, and Portuguese-language sources through the terms “mudan\u00e7as clim\u00e1ticas” or “aquecimento global”. Figure 1 shows these ebbs and flows in newspaper media coverage at the global scale \u2013 organized into seven geographical regions around the world \u2013 over the past 178 months (from January 2004 through October 2018).<\/p>\n Moving to considerations of content within these searches, Figure 2 shows word frequency data in the dynamic spaces of US newspaper and television media coverage in October 2018.<\/p>\n At the science-policy interface, an early October UN IPCC meeting in South Korea \u2013 and consequent Special Report on impacts of 1.5\u00b0C warming \u2013 garnered a great deal of media attention. Media coverage focus on the IPCC Special Report warning that to avoid passing 1.5\u00b0C, emissions must drop 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, and must reach \u2018net zero\u2019 by 2050. These pronouncements also harkened back to a slogan promoted by vulnerable countries at the Paris talks in 2015: \u20181.5 to stay alive\u2019. This was a reference to the bold emissions reductions needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.\u00a0BBC<\/a><\/em>\u00a0journalist Matt McGrath reported on how delegates gathered in Incheon, South Korea \u201cto hammer out a plan in co-operation with government delegates, on the actions that would need to be taken to meet this [1.5\u00b0C] goal\u201d. Amid considerable coverage of this report,\u00a0Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reporter Timothy Puko wrote, \u201crapid, far-reaching changes to almost every facet of society are needed to avoid catastrophic climate change, reforms far beyond anything governments are currently either doing or planning to do, according to a report from a United Nations-led scientific panel\u201d. Journalist Doyle Rice from\u00a0USA Today<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported,\u00a0\u201c<\/strong>\u00a0the world\u2019s economies must quickly reduce fossil fuel use while at the same time dramatically increasing use of clean, efficient energy. These transitions must start now and be well underway in the next 20 years\u201d. Read more …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Media and Climate Change Observatory (MeCCO) October 2018 Summary October media attention to climate change and global warming was up 43% throughout the world from the previous month of September 2018, and more than doubled (up 51%) from October last … Continue reading
\nOctober 2018 Summary<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/summaries\/images\/2018_22_figure1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/summaries\/images\/2018_22_figure2.jpg\")
In October, considerable attention was paid to\u00a0political<\/em>\u00a0content of coverage. The lead up to the 2018 US elections on November 6 have had some bearing on coverage. For example, in an article titled \u2018As climate change becomes more visible, its weight as a campaign issue is growing\u2019 journalist Evan Halper from the\u00a0Los Angeles Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0wrote, \u201cfor years, conventional wisdom among political strategists has labeled climate change as a politically weak issue, a concern of environmental activists but not the mass of voters. That\u2019s still the case in many areas. But in districts around the country where warming is exacerbating natural disasters and disrupting regional economies, the anxiety of voters like Hardwick has started to shift how candidates campaign\u201d. Meanwhile, in Canada in October, the government announced that they will impose carbon taxes on provinces that fail to create their own policies. The Prime Minister announced that the funds generated in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick, will go back to the taxpayers.\u00a0Reuters<\/a><\/em>\u00a0journalist David Rjunggren reported on this effort at the Canadian federal level, and this story ran in many other outlets throughout the country and beyond. He wrote, \u201cCanadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Tuesday said he would fulfill a promise to impose a carbon tax on provinces unwilling to combat climate change, prompting instant protests from a voter-rich part of the country. Trudeau, whose ruling Liberals face an election in October 2019, told a news conference that all the money collected would be returned directly to taxpayers in the four provinces without plans to curb the emission of greenhouse gases. Starting in April 2019 carbon pollution will initially cost C$20 ($15.27) a tonne, rising by C$10 a year until it reaches C$50 in 2022. Ottawa unveiled the proposal in 2016\u201d.<\/p>\n