{"id":2941,"date":"2018-01-04T17:05:29","date_gmt":"2018-01-04T17:05:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/?p=2941"},"modified":"2018-01-04T17:14:56","modified_gmt":"2018-01-04T17:14:56","slug":"a-review-of-media-coverage-of-climate-change-and-global-warming-in-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/2018\/01\/04\/a-review-of-media-coverage-of-climate-change-and-global-warming-in-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"A Review of Media Coverage of Climate Change and Global Warming in 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2943\" src=\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"660\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap.jpg 660w, https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap-300x136.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Media and Climate Change Observatory<\/a> (MeCCO)<\/em><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/summaries\/special_issue_2017.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Special Issue, 2017 Recap<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8211; report prepared through contributions from Max Boykoff, Kevin Andrews, Meaghan Daly, Jennifer Katzung, Gesa Luedecke, Celeste Maldonado, and Ami Nacu-Schmidt<\/em><\/p>\n<p>2017 saw media attention to climate change and global warming ebb and flow. At the global level, June of this year was the high water mark for coverage of climate change or global warming in the fifty-two sources across twenty-eight countries tracked by our Media and Climate Change Observatory (MeCCO) team. Figure 1 above shows media coverage of climate change or global warming month to month &#8211; organized into seven geographical regions around the world &#8211; from January through December 2017. This trend of highest levels of coverage in June was also the case at the national level in Australia, Canada, India, Spain and the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017. This increase was largely attributed to news surrounding United States (US) President Donald J. Trump&#8217;s withdrawal from the 2015 United Nations (UN) Paris Climate Agreement, with continuing media attention paid to the emergent US isolation following through the G7 summit a few weeks later.<\/p>\n<p>However, coverage of climate change or global warming across\u00a0<em>The Washington Post<\/em>,\u00a0<em>The Wall Street Journal<\/em>,\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>,\u00a0<em>USA Today<\/em>, and the<em>\u00a0Los Angeles Times\u00a0<\/em>in the US was at its highest level for the year in January. Figure 2 below illustrates these trends month to month in US press accounts in these five publications in 2017. The inauguration of US President Trump on January 20th along with great anticipation (punctuated by a heavy dose of dread) regarding a new phase of approaches to science and the environment by the incoming administration generated numerous stories on political and policy dimensions of climate change.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2946\" src=\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"660\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap2.jpg 660w, https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap2-300x136.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px\" \/>The prominence of news on climate change or global warming associated with Donald J. Trump in 2017 has been referred to as a &#8216;Trump Dump&#8217;. This is defined as a phenomena where media attention that would have focused on other climate-related events and issues instead was placed on Trump-related actions, leaving many other stories untold.<\/p>\n<p>This Trump Dump was illustrated most recently as the year 2017 came to an end, through media responses to the December 28 tweet from the President that referred to a cold snap in the Eastern half of the United States (approx. 1% of the Earth\u2019s surface) to cheekily call into question investments and action to confront climate change (see Figure 3 for the tweet). This goading on social media garnered reports and responses in a number of sources. For examples, journalist Kendra Pierre-Louis from\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/12\/28\/climate\/trump-tweet-global-warming.html?_r=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported that President Trump &#8220;appeared unaware of the distinction between weather and climate&#8221; in an article entitled &#8216;It\u2019s Cold Outside. Cue the Trump Global Warming Tweet&#8217;. Meanwhile, reporter Dino Grandoni from\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/energy-environment\/wp\/2017\/12\/28\/after-chilly-forecast-trump-tweets-u-s-could-use-a-little-bit-of-that-good-old-global-warming\/?utm_term=.b09233b2b57e\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Washington Post<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>pointed out, &#8220;Before sending that message,\u00a0Trump\u00a0had not sent any\u00a0tweet\u00a0containing the phrase &#8220;climate\u00a0change&#8221; or &#8220;global warming&#8221; since becoming president&#8230; In contrast, two years ago during the chilly winter of 2015,\u00a0Trump\u00a0sent off at least nine\u00a0tweets\u00a0holding up cold temperatures as evidence that\u00a0global warming\u00a0can&#8217;t be happening.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2948\" src=\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"660\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap3.jpg 660w, https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap3-300x136.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Throughout the year 2017, in terms of the frequency of words in articles in the US, &#8216;Trump&#8217; was invoked 19,184 times through 4117 stories in\u00a0<em>The Washington Post<\/em>,\u00a0<em>The Wall Street Journal<\/em>,\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>,\u00a0<em>USA Today<\/em>, and the<em>\u00a0Los Angeles Times\u00a0<\/em>in 2017 (a ratio of nearly 4.7 times per article on average). Figure 4 depicts word frequencies in US press accounts across the calendar year 2017.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2949\" src=\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap4.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"660\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap4.jpg 660w, https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2018\/01\/mecco2017_recap4-300x136.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This report is an aggregation of monthly summaries that our MeCCO team has compiled and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">posted each month on our website<\/a>. The project is a part of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research (CSTPR) in the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Initial funding for this project (six months) was received from the Office for Outreach and Engagement at the University of Colorado Boulder and continues with support from CSTPR.<\/p>\n<p>Media stories on climate change or global warming typically manifest through primary yet often intersecting\u00a0<em>political<\/em>,\u00a0<em>scientific<\/em>,\u00a0<em>cultural\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0<em>ecological\/meteorological\u00a0<\/em>themes. The month-to-month summaries that follow generally then highlight key events, stories and developments through these dimensions.<\/p>\n<p>As 2018 begins, it is a time for important reflection on how the past year 2017 shapes the one to come and those that follow. Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, &#8220;We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now.&#8221; May this report provide a useful resource to help confront climate change in 2018 and beyond. <a href=\"http:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/icecaps\/research\/media_coverage\/summaries\/special_issue_2017.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Media and Climate Change Observatory (MeCCO) Special Issue, 2017 Recap &#8211; report prepared through contributions from Max Boykoff, Kevin Andrews, Meaghan Daly, Jennifer Katzung, Gesa Luedecke, Celeste Maldonado, and Ami Nacu-Schmidt 2017 saw media attention to climate change and global &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/2018\/01\/04\/a-review-of-media-coverage-of-climate-change-and-global-warming-in-2017\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentaries"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-05-05 12:53:42","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category"},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2941"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2951,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941\/revisions\/2951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}