![\"permutter\"](\"http:\/\/ciresblogs.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2016\/11\/permutter.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Augusto Gonz\u00e1lez<\/a> has joined CSTPR through December 2016 while he is on an EU Fellowship from the European Commission in Brussels. Below is a portion of a blog post<\/a> from Augusto\u2019s Exploring Space Commercialisation in Colorado Blog<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n Congressman Ed Perlmutter (Colorado) is a staunch advocate of space development and, notably, space exploration. He is a vocal proponent of Mars exploration and is leading a quest for human travel to Mars to take place in 2033 \u2013 a year in which planetary alignment would make the trip significantly shorter.<\/p>\n Congressman Perlmutter has a long record of fighting for the space sector and space programmes. When the Constellation programme was shelved, he spearheaded efforts to ensure the survival of Orion Multi-purpose Crew Vehicle, whose prime contractor is Lockheed Martin, a company with a strong presence in Colorado. He has also been active on regulatory issues, where the main preoccupation is that regulations meet the standards needed to keep up with industry development and that industry has the necessary legal certainty to conduct their businesses.<\/p>\n In Jeff\u2019s opinion \u201ccommercial space\u201d is a misnomer. U.S. space manufacturing companies are all commercial. However, most of these companies have traditionally done most of their work under federal government contracts. Therefore, speak of commercial space does not necessarily convey a clear idea of what is it that the expression actually refers to. When looking into space activities one has to recognise that there are very different types of industries. Launcher industry is very specific and likely to remain closely connected to Federal government funding. Companies that seek to develop exclusively or primarily commercial business models, i.e. companies whose existence is not determined by or dependent on government funding, are in a different category. These companies are confronted with a different set of issues than those for which government funding is an essential lifeline. It may be necessary to see if there is a need for regulatory adaptations to cater for those differences. Read more …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Augusto Gonz\u00e1lez has joined CSTPR through December 2016 while he is on an EU Fellowship from the European Commission in Brussels. Below is a portion of a blog post from Augusto\u2019s Exploring Space Commercialisation in Colorado Blog. Congressman Ed Perlmutter … Continue reading
\nClearly government investment in ISS \u2013 be it cargo or crew space transportation \u2013 is a powerhouse that enables the space companies growth. In Jeff\u2019s opinion, Space X is no more commercial than Lockheed Martin or Boeing which have been traditional contractors for NASA. If dependence on federal government funding is what defines whether a space activity is commercial, there are companies that may be considered as more truly \u201ccommercial\u201d than those mentioned before.<\/p>\n