Two Problems of Climate Ethics: Can we Lose the Planet but Save Ourselves?

planet

by CSTPR Alumni Alexander Lee and Jordan Kincaid

Ethics, Policy & Environment
June 2016
DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2016.1195559
A. Lee and J. Kincaid

Climate change presents unprecedented challenges for the ethical community and society at large. The harms of climate change—real and projected—are well documented (Pachauri et. al, 2015). Rising sea levels, increased drought, warming temperatures and other impacts of climate change will devastate vulnerable communities, the global economy, and the natural world unless difficult choices, behavioral changes, and major policy shifts are made. But the problem we must address is not just the amalgam of climate harms. Climate change also presents a multifaceted problem of moral wrongdoing consisting of the actions that caused or coalesced to cause climate change.

The ‘problem’ of climate change is both an issue of harmful impacts and a question of wrongdoing. While certain deleterious effects of climate change are unavoidable, philosophy offers solutions to moral problems that are not contingent on successful mitigation or adaptation. In light of this distinction, Thom Brooks’ criticism that philosophers have ‘misunderstood’ the climate change problem as a problem that is solvable (Brooks, forthcoming) arises from a conflation of the two climate change problems and not from a shortcoming of philosophy in the climate conversation.

Climate harms may not be easily addressed, but righting wrongs is a separate matter. Read more …

This entry was posted in New Publications. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and must be approved to become visible to the public. Please do not submit your comment twice.